H

Wiki Health Report

Rewritten 2026-11-02 after the corpus audit of 1–2 November 2026.

The earliest pages of this wiki were written in April and May 2026 by an older language model. In November 2026 every page was reread and checked: each note it cites, each fact against a primary source, each claim against the other pages. The audit was run by twelve readers working in parallel on groups of related pages, coordinated through one list of decisions so that pages owned by different readers came out agreeing. Primary sources were the raw notes, the ingested texts, the harm.work sitemap and live site, the Club Internet database, the Entfaltung project files and, for facts about other people, Wikipedia. A fact repeated on three pages counted as unverified until one of them led back to a source.

What the audit found

About 1,160 factual claims with relevance beyond their own page were checked; a quarter were wrong. The damage came in five kinds.

Found texts read as the artist's words. Many numbered notes are passages by other writers, collected, cut, and sometimes recast in the first person. That is how the archive works, but the early pages quoted them as van den Dorpel's own formulations. They are now attributed:

Circular sourcing. Pages written by the language model were cited as evidence for claims about the practice. Propositions 5.4, "religious in shape, not in content", was a wiki formula of May 2026 that later pages quoted back as if he had said it. The apophatic reading now rests on the one primary source for it, the artist's remark of November 2026 that he knows what he wants mostly by what he doesn't want, "a bit like apophatic theology" (see Does a Work Still Need to Be New?).

Invented or garbled facts, copied between pages. Among the corrections:

Speculation in the wiki's own voice. Readings no source supports were cut or marked as the wiki's. The early pages also cast the practice as a counter to AI, though Stained Unravel, Interruptions and Entfaltung were programmed with a language model. Novelty claims ("first", "the move none of them made") were removed unless a source makes them, in which case they are attributed: the MAK purchase as "the first museum purchase of a tokenised artwork" is now the MAK's and Tina Rivers Ryan's claim, not the wiki's.

Accretion. Ingests had appended sections that restated other pages. The corpus is now about 130,000 words, down from 177,000, with no loss of sourced content.

Where contradictions were resolved

Where two pages carried claims that could not both be true, an Agent's reading now proposes the concept that keeps what each got right:

PageAgent's reading
Subconscious Computationthe deciding mind leaves generation and stays in selection
The Generative Thresholdthe criterion travels in a loop
Meditative Labourthe hand inside the loop
Evolutionary Logictechnology, not life
Stained Unraveldeath as one shape among 23
Mediation and the Archiverecursive inclusion; score kept, performance let go
Process Legibilityconcealment is a relation between image and rule
Colourjudgment relocated
left gallerycirculation, not stages
The Semiotic Squarethe new as experience, not as position
Différancethe reserve left undecided
Sacred Geometrymeaning initiated, not assigned
The Lozengecentrifugal frame, centripetal subdivision
The Squirclepresented as natural, derived by rule

Canonical homes

Each topic now has one page that carries the full argument; other pages give a sentence and a link.

TopicHome
The via negativaApophatic Theology (argument), About (mechanism)
Fitness functionsEvolutionary Logic
Sacred geometry, "as above, so below"Sacred Geometry
The Mohr comparisonPredecessors of Entfaltung
Pression des pairs mechanicsInterruptions
The MAK purchase and left galleryleft gallery
The organic–geometric continuumRandomness and Pattern
The Venster explorerVenster — the writing
The Lexachast interview quoteLexachast
The Abrons hand-drawing chainRelease Early (2013)

Sources added and repaired

Images

Before the audit, 53 images were used on more than one page, eight of them under two different filenames. Each now has one keeper page. The other pages show another view of the same work or a different work, taken from the harm.work image archive, the raw-note media or new captures of the live works; 63 new images were added. No two public wiki pages now share an image; a few summaries still show the images of the source text they summarise. Where no alternative of at least 960 px existed, the figure was dropped rather than reused. Captions were checked against what is in the frame, and several that named the wrong work or the wrong view were rewritten.

Open questions for the artist

These could not be settled from the sources.

Missing or unidentified sources

Works

Statements

Answered by the artist (November 2026)

Maintenance principles

  1. Trace every fact to a primary source. Other wiki pages are not sources, and a claim repeated across pages is no more verified than a claim made once.
  2. Check a note's author before quoting it as the artist's. Search a distinctive phrase. If the note is a found text, name its author and say what the note does to it.
  3. Pages written by the language model are not evidence. Cite the notes, his published texts and interviews, or his own words from conversation, attributed as "the artist" with month and year.
  4. One canonical home per topic, pointers elsewhere. A new ingest sharpens the home page; it does not add a restatement to five others.
  5. One image per page. Before adding an image, compare its checksum against public/images: the same picture under a second name is still a duplicate. Look at it before captioning it.
  6. Check links mechanically. node scripts/check-images.js for images, node tmp/corpus-lint.js for wikilinks, frontmatter and the index, and a batched Wikipedia API query for external links.